Author Topic: Unofficial 64-bit installer/archive 3.3.x  (Read 95968 times)

Nemo

  • qBittorrent Forum
  • Administrator
  • Forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 1322
  • Karma: +85/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Unofficial 64-bit installer/archive 3.3.x
« Reply #300 on: December 17, 2016, 10:51:51 PM »
He will probably release his own version of x64 build but with v3.3.10 sledge released also a x64 build: https://www.fosshub.com/qBittorrent.html

I installed and using it at the moment, works good. Only a very small issue while installing: https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/issues/6079, change that and it installs in the x64 directory.
Forum Rules and Guidelines

Forum Admin.
Dutch & Turkish Translator.




fusk

  • Veteran
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
  • Karma: +4/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Unofficial 64-bit installer/archive 3.3.x
« Reply #301 on: December 18, 2016, 09:57:32 AM »
Uhh.


stihia

  • Veteran
  • ***
  • Posts: 99
  • Karma: +4/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Unofficial 64-bit installer/archive 3.3.x
« Reply #302 on: January 03, 2017, 04:40:15 PM »
I've noticed different sizes between the two releases of 3.3.10 x64 version, both on libtorrent 1.0.10. Gelmir (Dayman) release it's 16.1 MB, while sledgehammer_999's is 18.55 MB. What's the explanation?
Anyway, big thanks to both for the hard work !

KitKat

  • Veteran
  • ***
  • Posts: 344
  • Karma: +26/-0
  • Here i stand with my bayonet...
    • View Profile
Re: Unofficial 64-bit installer/archive 3.3.x
« Reply #303 on: January 04, 2017, 04:43:42 AM »
I've noticed different sizes between the two releases of 3.3.10 x64 version, both on libtorrent 1.0.10. Gelmir (Dayman) release it's 16.1 MB, while sledgehammer_999's is 18.55 MB. What's the explanation?
Anyway, big thanks to both for the hard work !

Probably executeable/Installer packing differences..
Dayman could have Mpress/UPX'd his installer sledgehammer may not have, or they use different installers to deliver the same thing and sledgehammer's takes up additional space.
The following BBC is not allowed within your signature: html, img, php.

stihia

  • Veteran
  • ***
  • Posts: 99
  • Karma: +4/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Unofficial 64-bit installer/archive 3.3.x
« Reply #304 on: January 04, 2017, 11:16:17 AM »
Thank you, KitKat.
Another question: Gelmir releases that are using libtorrent 1.1 are safe now for daily use?
I am asking this because the 3.3.9 and 3.3.10 releases don't have the 3.3.7 mention: "Files marked with "libtorrent1.1." are not recommended for production; use at your own risk.".

KitKat

  • Veteran
  • ***
  • Posts: 344
  • Karma: +26/-0
  • Here i stand with my bayonet...
    • View Profile
Re: Unofficial 64-bit installer/archive 3.3.x
« Reply #305 on: January 05, 2017, 04:41:17 PM »
Thank you, KitKat.
Another question: Gelmir releases that are using libtorrent 1.1 are safe now for daily use?
I am asking this because the 3.3.9 and 3.3.10 releases don't have the 3.3.7 mention: "Files marked with "libtorrent1.1." are not recommended for production; use at your own risk.".

Gelmir builds from a direct fork of sledgehammer's master.
For all intents and purposes they are identical, if bugs exist in sledgehammers master regarding libtorrent1.1 they will exist in gelmir's version aswell.
Whether bugs exist, or how stable the libtorrent1.1 branch is i cant speak for as i've never personally used it.

This would be a question worth asking on the (probably both) github.
« Last Edit: January 05, 2017, 04:42:52 PM by KitKat »
The following BBC is not allowed within your signature: html, img, php.

sledgehammer_999

  • qBittorrent maintainer
  • Administrator
  • Forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 2336
  • Karma: +140/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Unofficial 64-bit installer/archive 3.3.x
« Reply #306 on: March 09, 2017, 08:28:35 PM »
Generally speaking, until the official build switches to 1.1.x proceed with a little caution. At least 1.1.2 should be used. It contains a shitload of changes. But I haven't tested actively with that branch so I cannot say if everything will work ok.
For example, I keep seeing increasing RAM usage during downloads while 1.0.x doesn't have this problem. I reached 200+MiB ram usage just by downloading 2 torrents while 1.0.x never breaks 100MiB(it is usually towards 80MiB).

Pasha_ZZZ

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Unofficial 64-bit installer/archive 3.3.x
« Reply #307 on: April 14, 2017, 10:53:26 AM »
Very big delay from official 3.3.12 release... Older version were released same day

Nemo

  • qBittorrent Forum
  • Administrator
  • Forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 1322
  • Karma: +85/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Unofficial 64-bit installer/archive 3.3.x
« Reply #308 on: April 15, 2017, 01:52:36 PM »
Very big delay from official 3.3.12 release... Older version were released same day

https://www.fosshub.com/qBittorrent.html

Both are there x32 & x64 official builds?
Forum Rules and Guidelines

Forum Admin.
Dutch & Turkish Translator.




Pasha_ZZZ

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Unofficial 64-bit installer/archive 3.3.x
« Reply #309 on: April 16, 2017, 07:55:50 PM »
Both are there x32 & x64 official builds?
I'm about Gelmir builds, this topic named "Unofficial", I think...

Nemo

  • qBittorrent Forum
  • Administrator
  • Forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 1322
  • Karma: +85/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Unofficial 64-bit installer/archive 3.3.x
« Reply #310 on: April 19, 2017, 12:47:58 AM »
It is.

But we got the official one now since few months.
Forum Rules and Guidelines

Forum Admin.
Dutch & Turkish Translator.




Pasha_ZZZ

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Unofficial 64-bit installer/archive 3.3.x
« Reply #311 on: April 19, 2017, 07:40:50 AM »
But we got the official one now since few months.
Official uses libtorrent 1.0, but Gelmir's - 1.1