Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Nemo

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 90
1
Windows / Re: Torrent read/write nvme benchmark.
« on: July 20, 2019, 08:30:09 pm »
I have tried and used Biglybt too in the past for a while and I liked it. Its Vuze but without any crap build in and its being maintained. My speeds were quite good and stable too to be honest. Only downside is Java usage but most computers have minimal 8GB or more in 2019 so memory ain't a problem. But im wondering how much memory it would consume when there are 500+ torrents loaded into it for example.

I always say use whatever works the best for you ;).

Problem was that some private trackers didn't allow it, got contacted by staff that told me to switch and they wouldn't tell me why. So never knew what the issue was. But speeds were much better., but forced to switch clients.
Had a look at tixati, which also seems like a good client, but it has some weird defaults, like it stores incomplete pieces on c: and you can't adjust write cache. Ran out of ideas.

Now i am actively considering reinstalling the machine with ubuntu so it can run autodl-irrsi with rutorrent natively.
Problem is i am a linux noob, creating raids and smb shares are such a pain in the butt on linux. I also checked WSL2, but not sure it's performance is good enough for torrent use. But, rtorrent also runs on libtorrent.

The new version 2.0 says:

2019/05/27: Play nicely with private trackers and more!. Version 2.0 released.

On the private trackers I use its whitelised, before wasn't indeed. Im using qBittorrent and BiglyBT, have them both installed.

2
Windows / Re: Torrent read/write nvme benchmark.
« on: July 19, 2019, 07:39:56 pm »
I have tried and used Biglybt too in the past for a while and I liked it. Its Vuze but without any crap build in and its being maintained. My speeds were quite good and stable too to be honest. Only downside is Java usage but most computers have minimal 8GB or more in 2019 so memory ain't a problem. But im wondering how much memory it would consume when there are 500+ torrents loaded into it for example.

I always say use whatever works the best for you ;).

3
Windows / Re: Remove torrents after download completed
« on: July 12, 2019, 09:20:46 pm »
Then its all good I guess.

4
Windows / Re: Research results
« on: July 12, 2019, 08:24:23 pm »
Never used the search function myself. You could open an issue at Github to see what responses you get there from others/devs.

5
Windows / Re: Remove torrents after download completed
« on: July 12, 2019, 08:23:18 pm »
Wouldn't it be nice to give back to the torrenting community, even if it is a little bit, before removing torrents after completion? Just my thoughts.. Anyway.

6
Windows / Re: My downloads won't autopause
« on: July 12, 2019, 08:21:29 pm »
It gets to ''Force Resume'' state when you choose that way. Just click ''Resume'' instead.

7
Generic / Re: does lowering upload lowers download speed?
« on: July 12, 2019, 08:20:13 pm »
How low did you set? And what is your max upload speed?\

Simple answer; Yes, it can have influence on your download speed.

8
Suggestions / Re: Feature request: Customize Colors
« on: June 10, 2019, 06:23:13 pm »
No captions please, thanks.

9
Windows / Re: How to associate magnet links with Windows 10
« on: June 10, 2019, 06:19:11 pm »
Go to settings and check .torrent and .magnet associations within qBittorrent.

10
Seems just a fork with few changed default settings I can see. This release has nothing to do with us.

The source is available for everyone so it can be build and modified like this.

11
Suggestions / Re: Add functional pls
« on: May 17, 2019, 04:51:13 pm »
Im wondering just why?

Few seconds/minutes work to set everything like you want before starting any application.

12
Introductions / Re: Hello New User
« on: January 12, 2019, 08:09:20 pm »
Welcome :).

13
Seeing Github milestones there will be a v4.1.6 release if needed but v4.2.0 is being worked on also. No ETA at this moment.

See here if you're interested:
https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A4.2.0

14
Windows / Re: Best stable version of QB
« on: October 18, 2018, 07:40:12 pm »
Funny.. Anyway use whatever fits you but so you know; it isn't supported here anymore.

If it works for you use it.

15
Windows / Re: speed graph not showing speed
« on: September 29, 2018, 08:09:49 pm »
Not possible, it shows the total speed for down and up.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 90