rate unites should be in k not in ki

Discuss suggestions and ideas for the forums, site, software.
Post Reply
g2c

rate unites should be in k not in ki

Post by g2c »

Hi,

for instance, ethernet speed is 10, 100, 1000Mb/s
sonet is 155 / 622 etc Mb/s
My isp speed is 2.5Mb/s

ki is used for storage because computers use binary logic. Nothing in data transmission  technology implies 2^n rates
User avatar
Nemo
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 1730
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:24 pm

Re: rate unites should be in k not in ki

Post by Nemo »

Not needed. Current values are already good enough.
loki

Re: rate unites should be in k not in ki

Post by loki »

It's actually more accurate labeling, when speaking of actual data to be called in KiB, MiB, GiB, etc... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibibyte
g2c

Re: rate unites should be in k not in ki

Post by g2c »

It is not a labeling. It is the unit in which the dimension (in this case - rate) is measured, just as forces are measured in Newtons and pressure in Pascals. For a rate of, say 10000000b/s, you can use the unit M and write 10Mb/s or you can use the unit Mi and write 9.5367...Mib/s. Using the unit of ki makes sense talking about storage. As for rates, ki has nothing "natural": the rate is fixed by a crystal and this can be adjusted "naturally" to whatever value you (well the standard) decide, no one rate that i am aware about is expressed more simply in ki than in k. ...

The invention of ki, was to have a unit equally valid for not IT pros than for pros. A pro reading a "2KB" chip knows very well that it is NOT 2000 bytes chip but 2048 bytes chip whereas an non IT pro might mistakenly take it to be exactly 2000 bytes.
Last edited by g2c on Fri Feb 03, 2012 7:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply