I just switched from Tixati to qBittorrent because some trackers don't allow Tixati. One feature that I really miss is the way torrents are sorted when I sort them by Status.
In Tixati, this would put the torrents that I'm actively seeding (actually connected to peers and uploading) next to the torrents that I'm actively downloading.
However, in qBittorrent, the two types of torrents are separated by by torrents that are 100% and seeding, but with no leechers.
I don't think it's intuitive to separate the two types of active torrents with the somewhat inactive ones, and that it would be much better to put them next to each other. After all, the color coding is enough to separate the two at a glance.
A small suggestion to the sorting by Status option.
Re: A small suggestion to the sorting by Status option.
So why would anyone wish to confuse or annoy all the current users of qBitTorrent just to make it more like a different client??
qBT does what it does in the way that it does.
Tixati does what it does in the way that it does
vive la différence as the French would have it.
qBT does what it does in the way that it does.
Tixati does what it does in the way that it does
vive la différence as the French would have it.
Re: A small suggestion to the sorting by Status option.
It's more user-intuitive to group the active torrents together when sorting by Status, at least from my perspective.
Just because it's different doesn't mean it's good. I don't see the point of scrolling through all the greyed out "Seeding" torrents just to see which ones I'm actually uploading.
Upsetting the userbase is a valid concern, I agree. What about another sorting option (unchecked by default) called "Activity" that groups the torrents with active network activity together? I'd use up/down speed but they are separate and cause the torrents to shift back and forth.
Just because it's different doesn't mean it's good. I don't see the point of scrolling through all the greyed out "Seeding" torrents just to see which ones I'm actually uploading.
Upsetting the userbase is a valid concern, I agree. What about another sorting option (unchecked by default) called "Activity" that groups the torrents with active network activity together? I'd use up/down speed but they are separate and cause the torrents to shift back and forth.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 1:17 pm
Re: A small suggestion to the sorting by Status option.
I don't make any promises but: http://qbforums.shiki.hu/index.php/topic,654.0.html
Re: A small suggestion to the sorting by Status option.
Thanks. I saw that post but wasn't sure if I should actually post in both places.
Re: A small suggestion to the sorting by Status option.
Filter by completed, Sort by upload speed. Job done.through all the greyed out "Seeding" torrents just to see which ones I'm actually uploading.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 1:17 pm
Re: A small suggestion to the sorting by Status option.
This actually makes more sense IMO.ciaobaby wrote:Filter by completed, Sort by upload speed. Job done.through all the greyed out "Seeding" torrents just to see which ones I'm actually uploading.
Re: A small suggestion to the sorting by Status option.
Actually I'm retarded. There's an "Active" tab to the left that never caught my eye.